For and against essay: GMO Foods - To Label Or Not To Label?



Below is an example of an outline for a For and Against Essay.



Introduction

  • Paraphrase! Restate the topic in your own words.
  • Acknowledge the complexity of the issue and state that you will look at both For and Against arguments.
Body (Paragraph 1)

  • Introduce the major argument For: "On the one hand..."
  • Present the main points and elaborate.
Body (Paragraph 2)

  • Introduce the major argument Against: "On the other hand..."
  •  Present the main points and elaborate.
Conclusion

  • State that after weighing both arguments you have finally developed your own opinion.
  • Close your essay with a dramatic, thought-provoking statement of your personal thoughts on the issue.



Essay Topic: “ Should GMOs be labeled or not – For and Against “

Genetically modified organisms (GMOs), also known as genetically modified or engineered foods, are created by forcing a piece of DNA from a totally different species, such as bacteria or viruses, into the DNA of a plant or animal. There are no long-term studies demonstrating that GMOs are safe for humans and the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) does not do its own safety testing. Since most people like to know what they are eating, the question is: “Should GMO products be labeled”?


Proponents of the idea of labeling genetically modified foods argue that refusing to label is wrong and unfair to the consumers who should have the right to know what they are buying so they can decide for themselves whether they want to buy the food or not. Even if health safety factors are not an issue, some people might have moral or religious objections. They also strongly advocate that the FDA does not require a set of specific human safety studies prior to commercialization, thus the consumer needs to be warned.


Opponents of the aforementioned idea of labeling, claim that both the companies that produce the crops, and a wide range of independent researchers, have studied GMO crop safety for years.  Highly qualified scientific panels have reviewed those data and consistently concluded that these improved crops represent no unusual risk compared to crops improved by traditional methods.  Consequently, since no hazard has been documented for dozens of biotech crops, over all these years of extensive commercialization, they feel that labeling GMO products does not make sense.


In conclusion, the issue of human safety over the consumption of genetically modified products should be a heated and controversial matter. But, since  there is no evidence that GM food is truly safe for human consumption, nor is there any consensus on this topic within the scientific community, mandatory food labeling should be reserved for well-documented public health needs and should be linked to viable public education efforts. 

(326 words)